EU threatens Elon Musk with a Twitter ban in Europe!

in blurtlife •  last year 

maxresdefault.jpg

The mainstream in the form of journalists and politicians continues to claim that the dismantling of freedom of speech is nothing more than a crazy conspiracy theory. All of this is supposedly not happening, there is no evidence that large corporations and governments are increasingly influencing what people are allowed to say, and yet there are always interesting developments, which clearly show things are moving in this direction and that we could very soon have Chinese conditions, especially here in Central Europe, but also in other Western countries.

Ever since Elon Musk took over Twitter, the criticism of him hasn't stopped! It's clear a certain political group in particular doesn't like what he's doing with this platform. The critics also include large government organizations, such as the European Union, which does not like at all what Elon Musk is doing with Twitter, because we can all witness how this platform is currently changing.

Twitter is suddenly allowing users to write things there that would have been unthinkable and immediately deleted in the past, beyond censorship and the opinion police, more and more users are being unblocked who were previously blocked (keyword: Trump), and in general you almost get the feeling that you can say almost anything, and it currently looks like this course will be maintained on Twitter. Of course, this could theoretically still change, but currently you can really say a lot more than you could a few months ago without having to fear serious consequences.

0.jpg

As expected, this new possibility of free expression of opinion does not fit at all into the plans of the European Union, which is why it is now threatening that if Twitter will not implement EU laws, i.e. dance to the EU's tune, so to speak, then Twitter will be banned in Europe. In terms of dealing with unpopular opinions, such behavior would be equivalent to that of dictatorships, which is why such behavior could no longer be justified by any pseudo-democratic pretext, but let's take a closer look at the predetermined points of these pseudo-democrats.

1: Twitter is not allowed to just randomly bring back users who have been banned from the platform.

This point is already interesting for the reason, because we all know of course that very many users on Twitter were simply completely arbitrarily blocked and that their statements was absolutely covered by the freedom of speech! In the end, these deleted statements and accounts simply did not fit into the left-liberal ideology, so they were deleted and blocked!

2: Moderators must aggressively pursue Fake News!

First of all, it has to be said this constellation of "aggressively pursue" sounds to me once again very questionable, but in itself there would be nothing wrong with it, if it were really Fake News, against which action is to be taken. If one would really implement this in such a way and define Fake News correctly, instead of also true, but disagreeable opinions immediately as "Fake News" to brand, at the same time however the Mainstream pleasant lies as truth to represent, then large medium houses would have a gigantic problem in view of their reporting of the last decades and very many "journalists" likewise!

So what is really meant by (so-called) fake news, against which action is to be taken, is simply news that does not fit into the picture of the official narrative, i.e. anyone who disagrees should be canceled on principle, regardless of their arguments and the truth of their statements. This demand by the European Union means nothing else, and such methods were also business policy at Twitter for a long time, which justifies the mass dismissals of the digital fascists there carried out by Elon Musk in my eyes and makes me hope that he will continue there as before in future.

a73.jpg

3: Elon Musk is expected to order an investigation and reveal information about how many active and banned users Twitter has.

To put it simply, Twitter is supposed to disclose all data about all users of the European Union and one can only assume the EU would like to have its fingers in the pie there, in order to then be able to decide who is now exempted on Twitter and who is not, who is allowed to talk and who has to remain silent, etc. As if that weren't enough, the EU is now threatening and saying if Twitter doesn't implement these three points, then the platform would allegedly violate the "Digital Services Act" and that would lead to Twitter being banned in Central Europe, which would bring us back to the conditions in demonstrably undemocratic countries.

It is also interesting this law on digital services is supposed to prevent disinformation and agitation. We all know by now how these words are used, because if someone has a different opinion and it contradicts the prevailing ideology, then of course it is immediately "agitation", we all know that. Another interesting thought in this context is many of these people in Europe, who are now showing "solidarity" with the protests in China, are the same people who have previously spoken out in favor of taking particularly harsh action against demonstrators in Europe, and these same hardliners are also backing the European Union, as it is currently behaving in its ailing and corrupt state.

So on the one hand you supposedly support the Chinese protests with your "solidarity", but on the other hand you favor that more and more Chinese conditions establish themselves in Central Europe.

8.png

It's interesting, isn't it? By the way, the whole thing is called "double standards" or "hypocrisy", both of which are very popular in the Western mainstream and should always be kept in mind when representatives of the "Western community of values" rattle on about our "common values".

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!