The problem with Blurt - Too many GAYS, and not enough TITS...

in blurtnews •  3 months ago 

Lets start with the massive GAY problem that we seem to have on Blurt...

Obviously, this is not concerning anyone's sexual proclivities - I have zero interest in other people bedroom antics if they don't affect me - live and let live.... but the title itself does offer the opportunity for megadrive and blurt.blog to stick a nsfw label on it.

wax.jpg

LEAVING THE GAY PROBLEM UNADDRESSED ONLY LEADS TO A HAVING A GAYBAR.

...And no sane rational people want to see that happen...

G reed
A nd
Y earning...

...Leads to...

B uilding
A
R edoubt

The GAY mindset is closely associated with the 'Sunk Cost Fallacy'.

xxx.jpg

What is the Sunk Cost Fallacy?
The Sunk Cost Fallacy describes our tendency to follow through on an endeavor if we have already invested time, effort, or money into it, whether or not the current costs outweigh the benefits.
The sunk cost fallacy means that we are making irrational decisions because we are factoring in influences other than the current alternatives.
The fallacy affects many different areas of our lives leading to suboptimal outcomes.

https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/the-sunk-cost-fallacy

Greed:
"An excessive desire to acquire or possess more than what one needs or deserves, especially with respect to material wealth."

and

Yearning: (over losses)
A persistent, often melancholy desire; a longing

Being in a state of GAY causes people to think and behave differently.
Principals become malleable, for example.
Rather than principals being the steadfast personal rules of how to conduct your life, the yearning over losses corrupts the weaker individual.

FUN FACT:
Individual who DO live more by their principals, tends to suffer far less from 'the sunk cost fallacy' and - be extension - the mental trauma's associated with it.

Individuals suffering from trauma (yearning over loss), do not posses the same rational perspectives that they may have once had.

Being in the GAY mindset causes those who are suffering from 'the sunk cost fallacy' to make poor decisions.

One of those poor decisions - as a way to rationalize to themselves - is justification.
( thus manifesting as the erosion of previously held principals).

Building a redoubt with others who are also suffering from the same mental affliction then tends to occur.
'Misery loves company', as they say.

Is Blurt a case of 'the sunk cost fallacy'...?

For me, not at all.

I never came to Blurt expecting anything different that what the whole world has now seen unfold in this last few months.

I came here 'hoping' that I was going to be proven incorrect - but seeing as I do not have hopium as my guide, just verifiable facts through observable actions, it came as no shock to me, seeing things unfold....

(top business tip - When you're selling a product - i.e a social media blogging with free speech - and then go out of your way to stymie people for purely personal, and petty reasons - You devalue your own product.
....That sounds like a sensible strategy, not.)

* In my case, that was attempting to put my account on the COAL list, and then the freezing of my account when that failed, and as a last resort (so far*), tagging much of my work 'nsfw' for no valid reason.

These attempted actions didn't hurt me - they hurt the platform.

They destroyed it's NO.1 selling point and ultimately (in my opinion), have forever tainted both the product and the individuals who have initiated this idiocy (and those that continue to support it).

....And it is utter, total, idiocy.

wtp.gif

*note:
I fully expect further actions against me as my truths psychologically hurt the man children running this place.

Idiotic decisions if not called out (what I've doing for this few months) - will only lead to more idiocy.

Throw in the feelings of GAY (sunk cost fallacy) and you get the proliferation of the GAYBAR.

For example....

world-travel-pro's 'call to war' against my account.

GAY, in action.
https://blurtlatam.com/blurt/@world-travel-pro/blurt-community-survey-the-trending-page

C: @ctime and @mariuszkarowski should stop up-voting Lucy's disparaging posts to trending.

This is an aggressive action against my account.

This is world travel pro throwing a metaphorical punch.
...is throwing the first punch to a known counter puncher with a hard punch really a good idea ?

This is an attempt through politicking - persuasion - to either stymie my free speech, or to financially hurt me.
Or both.

These 'calls to action' - and that is what they are, make no mistake...would have led directly to financially damaging me.
That is an aggressive action.

I have nothing against world-travel-'prostitute my principals'.

He's hurting for being in a state of GAY.
I get that.
He now seems adamant to build his GAYBAR with his fellow sunk cost fallacy sufferers.

His poor decisions are not my fault.
The compromise of his expressed principals is not my fault.
The building of his GAYBAR -with his new found friends - is also not my fault.

Not taking responsibility for your actions and then becoming a smaller person for tit, so as to not feel the pain of being in a state of GAY anymore - IS NOT MY FAULT.

Counter punching against someone's aggressive actions that were initiated against me ( not the other way around - yet again!) ....which was a call to action to financially hurt me - IS MY CHOICE.

wtpgif2.gif

I seem to me that people think that I - metaphorically - hit a lot harder than anyone else here on blurt.

You would be mistaken in that assumption, using my posts and comment to date as the barometer.
You have yet to see me 'throw a punch' with my full body weight behind it, so speak.

You have no idea what it will feel like, to have a punch coming right from my toes...
Capiche?
But I think you're gonna...

xxx.jpg

WORLD-TRAVEL-PRO
"Further more, just like I don't like Lucy singling people out and tearing them apart,"

LUCYLIN
" I don't give a flying fuck what GAY politicians like or dislike. Their vapid opinions carry no weight to those that discern action from words."

xxx.jpg

WORLD-TRAVEL-PRO
"Furthermore, how are you doing anything to help the platform, increase the price of blurt, attract investors by negatively fixating on people that clearly can't take it?"

LUCYLIN
"It WAS to undermine their legitimacy as 'leaders'* to make way for adults in the room to try an rebuild something that moronic idiots intentionally made into shit show - and a laughing stock."

*It is NO LONGER that.
Your actions have altered that perspective....Now it is something entirely different.

xxx.jpg

WORLD-TRAVEL-PRO
" Maybe they do need a little protection now to think about it. Yeah, for real."

Virtue signalling is not a virtue - but it is insulting to those that you 'signal' for.
Superiority complex, much ?

Are you REALLY suggesting that they - fully grown adults - are not capable of looking after themselves, and 'need your protection'..? ...seriously?...How insulting to them, and a total lack of respect (imo)..
Do you see them as childlike?...

...I can see it now - you and megadrive are just gonna be, like, ***BFF's ***!

xxx.jpg

WORLD-TRAVEL-PRO
"Make fun of me, I can take it."

LUCYLIN
Good to hear..time will tell....

xxx.jpg

WORLD-TRAVEL-PRO
" In final, I've got nothing against you personally. I've had your back more than once on this platform, and it is true our ideologies of the world basically the same as far as I know. All the free speech non-cencorship stuff, yes I'm right in line."

In final, I've got nothing against you personally.

.....That's good to hear, but I find the call to action to financially hurt me personally - and those words above - are inconsistent. ....Has something changed ?
Unless your 'call to action' to financially hurt me was 'for the greater good' (and you're nothing but a collectivist commie) ...Then how is this NOT a personal attack ?
You cant have it both ways.

No you're not the same as me...
You're playing the politician.....(A poor one).

We are very different, I feel...

You're busy building a GAYBAR with your newfound buddies, for example.

I was trying to re-set the product to what it was, when I arrived.

Your noticeable change was the final motivation that I needed.
Not because of you, per se - but the confirmation of the psychology at work on everyone in this environment. (including myself).

ALL DPoS crypto, and its governance construct as it stands now(and the social media blogging) is, in my opinion essentially an evil, socialist, parasitical, product.

As I'm sure you understand (more than most on here in the upper echelons)..."Business is business - nothing personal...."

Just like your call to action to try and financially hurt me. ...Nothing personal.

I'm doing all my stuff for 'the greater good', as well - for freedom lovers, and free speech lovers, everywhere.

You're welcome.

I'll get around to the lack of TITS on blurt - in another post.

Thinking
i t
T hrough
Strategically

T.I.T.S.

IMAG0065.JPG



Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

Remember when we were at school and there was a fight somewhere and everyone started shouting 'fight fight' then we all rushed over to see it like a giant magnetic pull. That's what this reminds me of. Is it an animal instinct or just humans?


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

In effect, you seem to revel at childish antics, egging the abuser on, demeaning the victim and blaming it all on "human are animals".

Da faq kinda person are you, don't you hold humanity and human nature in high regard, or do you think, this is human nature, the imbecilic antics of a man child who cares nothing about anything when he doesn't get his way and throws a tantrum. And you? You'll happily egg him on, seemingly, with no concern or care.

Fucking despicable. The same idiot who was trying to lecture me about sound money by proclaiming the idiotic notion that Greenbacks are (possibly the biggest failure of a currency since and who knows how long before) Sound Money backed by gold, both of which one couldn't be more mistaken about. No biggie, such oblivious idiocy will likely never be corrected because the pride and ego is all you are, which is why you savor drama as you do, jeering with the other idiots in the crowd since standing up against the pack only enters the playing field when the pack turns on you, though I believe you to be a complete coward who'll turn tail and run and hide, exactly like the idiot you cheer on who incidentally has been packing his bags and making for the doo r ever since I showed up, as he's done before.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

I have no problem calling out faults of the platform. But the way you were doing it was basically nasty and relentless.

You were financially hurting all of us and the platform, that is how I saw it. But maybe you didnt care, maybe you just overlooked that, or maybe that was your intention....to watch how low in dollar amount everyone s wallets got as you started to promote your own new business in direct competition.

So I did something about it, and judging by the concensus of the survey, seems like the general community was happy that I did. After all you asked me to shit or get off the pot. Hahaha

Anyway, thanks for making me the new focus of your blurt blogging carrer. Im totally flattered. Looking forward to the next. :) hope you are well. A

Oh and to make it clear again, Im all for ctime and mk supporting your work, just not the relentless shit talking the platform or people here...except me, that is fine...lol

But again, they are adults too and can and will do as they wish, and I respect that too.

Hope the next one is as good as this one. Have a great day!

Skipped all that vomited garbage when he began his "clever" acronym.

This one time, I did a post about Sandra Bollocks being a tranny.
A person commented "If Sandra Bollocks is a tranny, I am GAY"
"Yes", I replied...

image.png


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

Yikes!...looks like plastic.